A former Seton Hall basketball player has been added to a lawsuit brought against the school by former male player Myles Powell for what they claim to be misdiagnosed knee injuries.
In an amended complaint at Powell’s trial filed Tuesday, Jasmine Smith alleges that team staff told her that she suffered a bone contusion during training in fall 2020. She alleges that she was allowed to play and played the remainder of the season despite knee pain and swelling.
After Smith graduated from Seton Hall and sought to use a final year of basketball eligibility at Loyola Marymount, an MRI showed greater damage that forced her to undergo surgery and will require a second procedure, according to the lawsuit.
The injury will force Smith to miss the next basketball season and has hurt his hopes of playing professionally in Europe, according to the costume.
Powell and Smith both allege gross negligence, fraudulent cover-up and breach of contract in the lawsuit. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.
“Seton Hall University has always and continues to put the health and safety of our students first,” a spokesperson for the school said in an email. “We are aware of the matter, but are unable to comment on the pending litigation.”
Powell’s lawsuit filed last month claimed that the failure of South Orange, New Jersey-based school of trainer Kevin Willard and staff member Tony Testa to correctly diagnose a knee injury has resulted in physical and financial damage. Powell was Seton Hall’s third-highest career scorer and Big East Player of the Year in 2019-20, but was not selected in the NBA Draft last year after teams learned of the extent of the injury, according to the lawsuit.
The suit alleges Powell was misdiagnosed with an ankle injury at the start of the 2019-20 season, when it was actually a lateral meniscus tear in his right knee. The lawsuit further alleges that the goalkeeper with the highest score was not informed of the extent of his injury and that failure to treat it properly caused permanent damage.
In a response filed this month, the school argued that it was immune from complaints of Powell’s negligence under state law governing schools, charities or other institutions. non-profit. He also argued that Powell’s other claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty misinterpret the law.